In this blog article, Beth Abbott from our Conveyancing team demystifies the term ‘Caveat Emptor’, the principles of which are key when buying or selling a new home. What does Caveat Emptor mean? Put simply, Caveat Emptor is a Latin term...
Competitive interview leads to disability discrimination
Waddingham v NHS Business Services Authority
During a redundancy process, Mr Waddingham was diagnosed with cancer. This meant that he was disabled for employment law purposes, imposing additional obligations on his employer – including the duty to make reasonable adjustments.
He was interviewed for a new role within the NHS, but he did not hit the required 75% competency level and was not appointed. He claimed disability discrimination, and won; he had been put at a substantial disadvantage.
The tribunal held that it would have been reasonable for the employer to have assessed Mr Waddingham – a long-serving NHS employee – differently, by looking at his employment history and at notes of his appraisals. The 75% threshold did not need to be lowered, but the employer ought to have approached the assessment in another way. This should have included taking account of the effects Mr Waddingham’s cancer treatment would have on his performance at interview; his pain-relief drugs affected his concentration and caused fatigue.
One interesting point made by the tribunal was around the positive spin Mr Waddingham put on his situation. He was keen to press ahead with the interview, for instance. There is nothing to say that an employer faced with similar facts could not go along with that, rather than put the process on hold. But it would not be good enough to do so blindly – in other words, without properly considering all of the circumstances.